Trump Fiefdom and
the Trilateral World
Part 2
the Trilateral World
Part 2
Click or Tap Icons to Share! Thank you!
Authored By :
Published On :
Last Updated :
Continuing our discussion from part one, and keeping all of the previous information in mind, allow me to list for you the pertinent points we have already discussed in this article:
* President Trump wants to restore ownership and control of the Panama Canal Zone to the United States, even if it may mean resorting to military force.
* President Trump just renamed the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, thus better delineating the US's southern maritime border, and sphere of influence and control.
* President Trump wants Canada to become the 51st American state, thus extending both the United States' territorial size and integrity.
* President Trump wants to purchase the island of Greenland, thus further extending the United States' territorial size and integrity.
Now, tell me my friends, what does that look like to you? Please stop for a minute and actually visualize that on a map. Well, what it certainly appears to be to me is nothing short of outright kingdom-building, or fiefdom-building if you prefer. Doesn't President Trump's objective seem rather obvious when we consider all of the aforementioned points together? Furthermore, to all the above, we can add the fact that President Trump's strategy of engaging in a tariffs war and slamming both Canada and Mexico with 25% tariffs may be designed to significantly weaken both countries.
But to what end might President Trump be doing this? Well, aside from his obvious desire to further enrich the United States, and bring more production and jobs back home, the most likely objective would seem to be to pressure both of these nations into bowing to America's will.
Assuming for the sake of argument that everything I have just proposed thus far regarding President Trump's ultimate intentions are true, what comes next? Will Trump then decide to extend his kingdom even further by slowly taking Mexico, Central America and perhaps even South America as well, so that he controls a third part of the world? What? You think I am starting to sound a little bit absurd and ridiculous? Well, I warned you at the beginning of this article that I was going to throw something rather crazy-sounding at you. And I am not even done yet. Oh man! What now Bill?
Well, my friends, who knows what may have actually been said during that first meeting in Saudi Arabia, being as no other parties were present except for the USA and Russia, besides the Saudis who served as hosts and partial observers. To add to that, who knows what may be said at any future meetings which will occur between the United States and Russia.
Okay, finally, we come to the big reveal, and to what some of my readers may possibly view as my craziest thought yet. What if in addition to discussing ending the war in Ukraine -- with Ukraine losing about 20% of its original territory -- something bigger was discussed, or will be discussed at future US-Russia meetings? We already discussed President Trump's theoretical fiefdom, but what if there is an even bigger plan and strategy which has been put into motion behind the scenes, which is slowly being doled out to the world?
What if -- and granted, this is a very big if -- the entire plan involves not just bringing the Russia-Ukraine War to an end -- and thus bringing peace to that region of the world -- but also bringing peace to the entire world, as President Trump seems to desire? After all, in case you are not aware of it, the misguided Orthodox Jews are already referring to Mr. Trump as the "Prince of Peace", and seem to view him as their political messiah who will help them to construct a third Jewish temple on Mount Moriah -- a.k.a. the Temple Mount -- in the Old City, or East Jerusalem. They even went so far as to mint a gold coin with Trump's and Persian king Cyrus's images on it. Of course, knowing Trump, all of this is most certainly feeding his ego and his messiah complex.
I mean, look my friends. No war can go on forever. Eventually you run out of fighters. You run out of weapons. Your cities are slowly destroyed. Your people greatly suffer and slowly die. Your national infrastructure is destroyed. Your national economy is wrecked. In short, there are simply no advantages to long-term war. It is all negatives. It is for that reason that the people eventually grow tired of it, and they rebel against it. It is also why national leaders -- no matter how strong they may appear to be on the surface -- must at some point eventually seek peace. A nation can only absorb so much destruction and loss from war before it is time to call it quits.
Indications are that both Russia and Ukraine have reached that point, even if their leaders are too proud to admit it publicly. Furthermore, the citizenry will only endure so much suffering before they will eventually turn against their own government leaders. National patriotism will only carry them so far during a war. Right? As such, those leaders need to be smart enough to recognize when to quit while they are still ahead, and have not lost voter confidence.
So getting back to the thought of global peace, exactly how could such a grandiose plan really be achieved? Actually, I more or less already told you. What if behind-closed-doors meetings are already occurring -- or will soon be occurring -- where the great powers mutually agree to carve up the world into several well-defined sections, and to mutually respect each other's boundaries and spheres of influence? What would be the end result of such a wide-ranging plan? It would potentially and hopefully be global peace, which has evaded the world for many decades now.
Please note that by "great powers", I'm actually referring to Russia, China and the United States. After all, they are the nations with the biggest guns -- meaning military power -- as well as the most economic power. I mentioned earlier in this article how I have long felt that the United States would eventually sacrifice both Ukraine and Taiwan for the sake of maintaining global peace. As we have seen from the most recent news, President Trump appears to already be doing that with Ukraine.
So if President Trump is already doing that with Ukraine in order to achieve peace, doesn't it seem likely that he would likewise sacrifice Taiwan to China as well when the right time arrives? After all, what would be the point of working so hard to end the Russia-Ukraine War, just to turn around and engage in a new, direct nuclear war with China over the Taiwan issue? It makes absolutely no sense. Right?
So what if this theoretical behind-the-scenes agreement is that the United States absorbs all of the areas I already mentioned to you, and possibly Australia and New Zealand as well? Russia would then be allowed to take Ukraine and the rest of Europe, as well as the Middle East and Africa. China would be allowed to take over Taiwan and the rest of Asia, as well as the Indo-Pacific region. Or perhaps the United States and China would divide the Indo-Pacific region along the Second Island Chain in the Western Pacific Ocean. That would of course include my island of Guam in the Mariana Islands archipelago.
I obviously cannot say with exactitude what the precise specifics of each of these regions would be, being as this is all personal conjecture and speculation. But the main thought to consider here is that under such a speculative arrangement, the world would be divided into three primary sectors, each one of which would be under the authority of the USA, Russia or China. As I said, all three great powers would be fully committed to respecting the boundaries and integrity of the other two, and thus, global peace would be maintained with no wars. It would be a multipolar world, or a trilateral world.
As outlandish as this may sound to some of you, as I said, we may possibly already be seeing the very beginning of such an arrangement. It is no coincidence that the United States under the leadership of Donald Trump, has begun to switch alliances, is pulling US aid from Ukraine, and has warned that it will abandon Europe and NATO, if they fail to get their act together. By threatening to pull the US away as he is now doing, President Trump is in fact forcing Europe and NATO to be better equipped to defending themselves against potential exterior enemies. That most certainly includes Vladimir Putin's Russian bear.
However, what if the United States does eventually pull away from Europe completely, Europe becomes weakened and is not properly prepared, and then Russia sees that weakness, and decides to go in for the kill? Would it be America's fault, or would it be Europe's fault for depending too much on the United States and not learning to stand on its own two feet and defending itself? In this indirect way, President Trump could give Europe to Russia, as a part of their backroom deal where we have trilateral power-sharing between the USA, Russia and China.
Think about that for a minute. A trilateral world composed of three empires, three kingdoms, three hegemonic sections, each ruled by its own emperor, king, president or whatever you wish to call them. Just as we say online, "My timeline, my rules", it would be the same thing. In other words, "My empire, my rules." Each of these three empires would have so much natural wealth, that they would be able to fully sustain themselves without depending on the other two. In other words, there would be no need to go to war in order to steal someone else's land or resources. It would result in a balanced trilateral world where peace reigns at last.
Now, if these events were to start occurring at some point in the not-too-distant future, and Russia were to engage in a strategy to completely take over Europe, how do you think the American people would react to this? Well, obviously, there would be some people who would raise their voices and object, and demand that the United States intervene in order to stop Vladimir Putin. Any remaining warmongers in the US government which President Trump hasn't managed to weed out yet would most certainly want to engage in war against Russia.
But what about the American people themselves? Well, to be quite frank, similar to myself, I am convinced that a lot of Americans -- particularly elderly Americans -- are really tired of witnessing decade after decade of constant wars somewhere in the world. In particular, we are tired of wars which are both a constant financial and a military drain on this country. We are very tired of seeing our sons and our daughters arriving home either dead, psychologically messed up, seriously maimed, or dependent on powerful drugs just so that they are able to continue functioning in society. It is rather obvious that President Trump himself is clearly tired of it all as well. Thus, he wants peace.
If we consider the powerful influence of the MAGA -- Make America Great Again -- movement with its well-known "America First" agenda, I believe that President Trump could convince most Americans that allowing Vladimir Putin to do as he will is the most pragmatic route to follow. In other words, if NATO and the European Union procrastinated too long, and if they are simply unable to properly defend themselves against an aggressor such as Russia, then so be it. Survival of the fittest is the motto of this present world, even if it is not how God operates.
So this is why I believe that the United States, under the leadership of Donald Trump, would be willing to sacrifice the European Union to Vladimir Putin's Russia. As I stated earlier, Trump would do it, and allow it, for the sake of maintaining global peace. President Trump could address the American people and say something such as the following:
"Look folks; we have got our wonderful, beautiful American Empire which now stretches from Greenland, to Canada, to the USA, to Mexico and beyond. We have enough natural resources in this great area to last us for many years to come. We are protected on both sides by two great, big, beautiful oceans. There is no need to go to war. Let's put our American Empire first as we have been doing, and not foolishly waste any of our valuable resources on another senseless war. We have our beautiful piece of the pie. Let Vladimir Putin have his as well. Let Xi Jinping have his piece as well. Let's all just let peace reign at last. It is the pragmatic thing to do."
I wonder if Trump needs a speech writer? No, just joking. But on the serious side, don't you think that this kind of strategy would appeal to a lot of America First folks who just want to live their lives in peace, raising their own families and enjoying life, without having to worry about another potential war on the horizon?
So to reiterate an earlier point, the simple fact of the matter is that the United States does not need Ukraine and Europe to survive. It has enough natural resources of its own. Furthermore, as I explained a very long time ago, the United States and the 27-member European Union are actually economic competitors which are vying for the same global markets. But if the world is simply divided up into three primary sections, and everyone agrees to stay in their own lane, then the competition vanishes. Trade can flow between all of the entities located within each of the three areas.
As I also mentioned earlier, not only does the United States not really need Europe or Ukraine, but the simple truth of the matter is that Europe has in fact become an economic and a military drain on the United States. As we have discussed before, not only did the Biden administration's willingness to supply Ukraine with so many weapons deplete our American stockpiles -- as has been publicly reported multiple times -- but having such a strong US military presence all across Europe -- and in other parts of the world -- has thinned out American troops too much, and made America more vulnerable at home. This is suicidal. It is an open invitation to our enemies to attack us.
As many of you will already know, this is precisely why the president has now taken such a firm stance against Europe and NATO. He believes -- and rightly so -- that the United States has been getting the raw end of the deal for far too long, while at the same time playing the role of babysitter for the European Union and NATO. Can you really blame him for adopting his current position?
You know, if you really stop to think about, it really does make a lot of sense if we consider what is going on in the world outside of politics. So what do I mean by this? Well, consider the following.
Let me start by asking you a simple question: What is a very common trend which we can see occurring throughout the world today? Quite simply, the big guys who have lots of money -- such as the conglomerates -- gobble up the little guys. For example, through a variety of tactics -- including financial incentives -- farming conglomerates swallow up small family farms and become even more powerful. Likewise, big banking institutions swallow up even smaller banks. Furthermore, large publishing houses swallow up smaller publishers. Huge news conglomerates swallow up smaller news stations. Large software companies constantly swallow up smaller software companies. HMOs gobble up smaller local hospitals. Large telecommunications companies swallow up the smaller ISPs.
And on and on this very same devouring process continues in every facet of life. While we as Bible-believing Christians may not like it and don't agree with it, nevertheless, it is the way of this present world where greed, money, profit and the lust for power are the only things that rule. As we all know, we simply live in a dog-eat-dog world. The end result is that most of the power ends up being concentrated in the hands of a very few. Of course, this is very dangerous, but honestly speaking, there is not really much that you and I can do about it. After all, most of us are the peons at the bottom of the barrel who are barely scraping by. However, we manage by God's Grace.
This veracious devouring process being as widespread as it obviously is, why should it really surprise us that this very same process occurs within the world of politics and global governance as well? The fact of the matter is that hegemony and empire-building is really nothing new. It has been around for literally thousands of years. Concentrating power in the hands of a few -- or even in the hands of one individual -- has in fact really been the norm. So looking at the issue from this perspective, it is possible that my theory regarding the United States, Russia and China may have more merit than what I at first realized.
So for those of my readers who have made it this far in this article, those are my crazy thoughts: a multipolar world or trilateral world divided into three primary sections, ruled by China, Russia and the United States. A world living under global peace, as long as each of the three emperors or kings stays in his own playground. "You stay out of my backyard, and I will also stay out of yours. Mutual respect." So what do YOU think? Is this possibly our future, or do you think that I am just plain crazy for even daring to suggest such a scenario? For those of you who may disagree with my rather outrageous idea, and who may want to come after me, please note that I have three vicious Doberman Pincer guard dogs. Just joking. They are actually German Shepherds. [smirk].
With these thoughts, I will bring this article to a close. It is my hope that you've found it informative and enlightening, and I pray that it has been a blessing in your life as well. If you have an account with Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr or with any other social network, I would really appreciate if you'd take the time to click or tap on the corresponding link that is found on this page. Thanks so much, and may God bless you abundantly!
For additional information and further study, you may want to refer to the list of reading resources below which were either mentioned in this article, or which contain topics which are related to this article. All of these articles are likewise located on the Bill's Bible Basics web server. To read these articles, simply click or tap on any link you see below.
2024 US Presidential Election: Into the Darkness
America vs. Iran: "This Was an Act of War"
America, Trump, MAGA and Peace, Safety and Prosperity
America: Land of the Free . . . and Hypocrisy!
Communism: Is the Dead Beast Really Dead?
Communism: The Raging Bear Out of Control!
Don't Ever Underestimate Our Spiritual Enemy
Donald Trump, Gaza, and the Tyre Prophecy
False Accusation: Trump is a Warmonger!
Gaza Strip Horrors and the Trump Plan
If You Poke a Bear Long Enough
Is Elon Musk the Antichrist?
It Is Time to Wake Up!
Obama, McCain and the Bush Legacy
President Trump and the Cashless Society
President Trump and the Golden Age
Saddam Hussein's Execution and the Euro-Dollar War
Science and Technology: The Forbidden Knowledge?
The Public School System and School Prayer
To Vote, or Not to Vote
What is Wrong with Modern America?
Who is the Real Terrorist?
Bill Kochman
Published On :
February 26, 2025
Last Updated :
March 28, 2025
Trump's Primary Objectives, Kingdom-Building In The Making, Trump's Motives For Pressuring Canada And Mexico, Expansion Of The American Empire, Russia-Ukraine Peace Deal And Hidden Backroom Deals, Secret Global Peace Plan, The Orthodox Jews' Third Temple Plans And Infatuation With Trump, The Long-Term Negative Effects Of Extended Wars, People Only Endure So Much Suffering And Loss, Will China Russia USA Carve Up World To Achieve Global Peace?, Will Ukraine And Taiwan Be Sacrificed?, Geographical Divisions Into A Trilateral World, Donald Trump Seems To Be Switching Alliance From Europe And NATO To Russia, European Union Unprepared To Oppose Russia, Three Empires With Vast Natural Resources, Need For War Eliminated, Global Peace, Reaction Of Warmongers And American People, Tired Of Decades Of War, Powerful Influence Of MAGA Movement, Pragmatic Speech To Win American Public, USA Does Not Need Europe And Ukraine, Trilateral Division Eliminates Economic Competition, Europe Is A Financial And Military Drain On USA, American Forces Spread Too Thin, Dog-Eat-Dog World Motivated By Greed Money Profit, Hegemony And Empire-Building Are Actually The Historical Norm, Global Peace Under Three Emperors, Conclusion, Reading List
Continuing our discussion from part one, and keeping all of the previous information in mind, allow me to list for you the pertinent points we have already discussed in this article:
* President Trump wants to restore ownership and control of the Panama Canal Zone to the United States, even if it may mean resorting to military force.
* President Trump just renamed the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, thus better delineating the US's southern maritime border, and sphere of influence and control.
* President Trump wants Canada to become the 51st American state, thus extending both the United States' territorial size and integrity.
* President Trump wants to purchase the island of Greenland, thus further extending the United States' territorial size and integrity.
Now, tell me my friends, what does that look like to you? Please stop for a minute and actually visualize that on a map. Well, what it certainly appears to be to me is nothing short of outright kingdom-building, or fiefdom-building if you prefer. Doesn't President Trump's objective seem rather obvious when we consider all of the aforementioned points together? Furthermore, to all the above, we can add the fact that President Trump's strategy of engaging in a tariffs war and slamming both Canada and Mexico with 25% tariffs may be designed to significantly weaken both countries.
But to what end might President Trump be doing this? Well, aside from his obvious desire to further enrich the United States, and bring more production and jobs back home, the most likely objective would seem to be to pressure both of these nations into bowing to America's will.
Assuming for the sake of argument that everything I have just proposed thus far regarding President Trump's ultimate intentions are true, what comes next? Will Trump then decide to extend his kingdom even further by slowly taking Mexico, Central America and perhaps even South America as well, so that he controls a third part of the world? What? You think I am starting to sound a little bit absurd and ridiculous? Well, I warned you at the beginning of this article that I was going to throw something rather crazy-sounding at you. And I am not even done yet. Oh man! What now Bill?
Well, my friends, who knows what may have actually been said during that first meeting in Saudi Arabia, being as no other parties were present except for the USA and Russia, besides the Saudis who served as hosts and partial observers. To add to that, who knows what may be said at any future meetings which will occur between the United States and Russia.
Okay, finally, we come to the big reveal, and to what some of my readers may possibly view as my craziest thought yet. What if in addition to discussing ending the war in Ukraine -- with Ukraine losing about 20% of its original territory -- something bigger was discussed, or will be discussed at future US-Russia meetings? We already discussed President Trump's theoretical fiefdom, but what if there is an even bigger plan and strategy which has been put into motion behind the scenes, which is slowly being doled out to the world?
What if -- and granted, this is a very big if -- the entire plan involves not just bringing the Russia-Ukraine War to an end -- and thus bringing peace to that region of the world -- but also bringing peace to the entire world, as President Trump seems to desire? After all, in case you are not aware of it, the misguided Orthodox Jews are already referring to Mr. Trump as the "Prince of Peace", and seem to view him as their political messiah who will help them to construct a third Jewish temple on Mount Moriah -- a.k.a. the Temple Mount -- in the Old City, or East Jerusalem. They even went so far as to mint a gold coin with Trump's and Persian king Cyrus's images on it. Of course, knowing Trump, all of this is most certainly feeding his ego and his messiah complex.
I mean, look my friends. No war can go on forever. Eventually you run out of fighters. You run out of weapons. Your cities are slowly destroyed. Your people greatly suffer and slowly die. Your national infrastructure is destroyed. Your national economy is wrecked. In short, there are simply no advantages to long-term war. It is all negatives. It is for that reason that the people eventually grow tired of it, and they rebel against it. It is also why national leaders -- no matter how strong they may appear to be on the surface -- must at some point eventually seek peace. A nation can only absorb so much destruction and loss from war before it is time to call it quits.
Indications are that both Russia and Ukraine have reached that point, even if their leaders are too proud to admit it publicly. Furthermore, the citizenry will only endure so much suffering before they will eventually turn against their own government leaders. National patriotism will only carry them so far during a war. Right? As such, those leaders need to be smart enough to recognize when to quit while they are still ahead, and have not lost voter confidence.
So getting back to the thought of global peace, exactly how could such a grandiose plan really be achieved? Actually, I more or less already told you. What if behind-closed-doors meetings are already occurring -- or will soon be occurring -- where the great powers mutually agree to carve up the world into several well-defined sections, and to mutually respect each other's boundaries and spheres of influence? What would be the end result of such a wide-ranging plan? It would potentially and hopefully be global peace, which has evaded the world for many decades now.
Please note that by "great powers", I'm actually referring to Russia, China and the United States. After all, they are the nations with the biggest guns -- meaning military power -- as well as the most economic power. I mentioned earlier in this article how I have long felt that the United States would eventually sacrifice both Ukraine and Taiwan for the sake of maintaining global peace. As we have seen from the most recent news, President Trump appears to already be doing that with Ukraine.
So if President Trump is already doing that with Ukraine in order to achieve peace, doesn't it seem likely that he would likewise sacrifice Taiwan to China as well when the right time arrives? After all, what would be the point of working so hard to end the Russia-Ukraine War, just to turn around and engage in a new, direct nuclear war with China over the Taiwan issue? It makes absolutely no sense. Right?
So what if this theoretical behind-the-scenes agreement is that the United States absorbs all of the areas I already mentioned to you, and possibly Australia and New Zealand as well? Russia would then be allowed to take Ukraine and the rest of Europe, as well as the Middle East and Africa. China would be allowed to take over Taiwan and the rest of Asia, as well as the Indo-Pacific region. Or perhaps the United States and China would divide the Indo-Pacific region along the Second Island Chain in the Western Pacific Ocean. That would of course include my island of Guam in the Mariana Islands archipelago.
I obviously cannot say with exactitude what the precise specifics of each of these regions would be, being as this is all personal conjecture and speculation. But the main thought to consider here is that under such a speculative arrangement, the world would be divided into three primary sectors, each one of which would be under the authority of the USA, Russia or China. As I said, all three great powers would be fully committed to respecting the boundaries and integrity of the other two, and thus, global peace would be maintained with no wars. It would be a multipolar world, or a trilateral world.
As outlandish as this may sound to some of you, as I said, we may possibly already be seeing the very beginning of such an arrangement. It is no coincidence that the United States under the leadership of Donald Trump, has begun to switch alliances, is pulling US aid from Ukraine, and has warned that it will abandon Europe and NATO, if they fail to get their act together. By threatening to pull the US away as he is now doing, President Trump is in fact forcing Europe and NATO to be better equipped to defending themselves against potential exterior enemies. That most certainly includes Vladimir Putin's Russian bear.
However, what if the United States does eventually pull away from Europe completely, Europe becomes weakened and is not properly prepared, and then Russia sees that weakness, and decides to go in for the kill? Would it be America's fault, or would it be Europe's fault for depending too much on the United States and not learning to stand on its own two feet and defending itself? In this indirect way, President Trump could give Europe to Russia, as a part of their backroom deal where we have trilateral power-sharing between the USA, Russia and China.
Think about that for a minute. A trilateral world composed of three empires, three kingdoms, three hegemonic sections, each ruled by its own emperor, king, president or whatever you wish to call them. Just as we say online, "My timeline, my rules", it would be the same thing. In other words, "My empire, my rules." Each of these three empires would have so much natural wealth, that they would be able to fully sustain themselves without depending on the other two. In other words, there would be no need to go to war in order to steal someone else's land or resources. It would result in a balanced trilateral world where peace reigns at last.
Now, if these events were to start occurring at some point in the not-too-distant future, and Russia were to engage in a strategy to completely take over Europe, how do you think the American people would react to this? Well, obviously, there would be some people who would raise their voices and object, and demand that the United States intervene in order to stop Vladimir Putin. Any remaining warmongers in the US government which President Trump hasn't managed to weed out yet would most certainly want to engage in war against Russia.
But what about the American people themselves? Well, to be quite frank, similar to myself, I am convinced that a lot of Americans -- particularly elderly Americans -- are really tired of witnessing decade after decade of constant wars somewhere in the world. In particular, we are tired of wars which are both a constant financial and a military drain on this country. We are very tired of seeing our sons and our daughters arriving home either dead, psychologically messed up, seriously maimed, or dependent on powerful drugs just so that they are able to continue functioning in society. It is rather obvious that President Trump himself is clearly tired of it all as well. Thus, he wants peace.
If we consider the powerful influence of the MAGA -- Make America Great Again -- movement with its well-known "America First" agenda, I believe that President Trump could convince most Americans that allowing Vladimir Putin to do as he will is the most pragmatic route to follow. In other words, if NATO and the European Union procrastinated too long, and if they are simply unable to properly defend themselves against an aggressor such as Russia, then so be it. Survival of the fittest is the motto of this present world, even if it is not how God operates.
So this is why I believe that the United States, under the leadership of Donald Trump, would be willing to sacrifice the European Union to Vladimir Putin's Russia. As I stated earlier, Trump would do it, and allow it, for the sake of maintaining global peace. President Trump could address the American people and say something such as the following:
"Look folks; we have got our wonderful, beautiful American Empire which now stretches from Greenland, to Canada, to the USA, to Mexico and beyond. We have enough natural resources in this great area to last us for many years to come. We are protected on both sides by two great, big, beautiful oceans. There is no need to go to war. Let's put our American Empire first as we have been doing, and not foolishly waste any of our valuable resources on another senseless war. We have our beautiful piece of the pie. Let Vladimir Putin have his as well. Let Xi Jinping have his piece as well. Let's all just let peace reign at last. It is the pragmatic thing to do."
I wonder if Trump needs a speech writer? No, just joking. But on the serious side, don't you think that this kind of strategy would appeal to a lot of America First folks who just want to live their lives in peace, raising their own families and enjoying life, without having to worry about another potential war on the horizon?
So to reiterate an earlier point, the simple fact of the matter is that the United States does not need Ukraine and Europe to survive. It has enough natural resources of its own. Furthermore, as I explained a very long time ago, the United States and the 27-member European Union are actually economic competitors which are vying for the same global markets. But if the world is simply divided up into three primary sections, and everyone agrees to stay in their own lane, then the competition vanishes. Trade can flow between all of the entities located within each of the three areas.
As I also mentioned earlier, not only does the United States not really need Europe or Ukraine, but the simple truth of the matter is that Europe has in fact become an economic and a military drain on the United States. As we have discussed before, not only did the Biden administration's willingness to supply Ukraine with so many weapons deplete our American stockpiles -- as has been publicly reported multiple times -- but having such a strong US military presence all across Europe -- and in other parts of the world -- has thinned out American troops too much, and made America more vulnerable at home. This is suicidal. It is an open invitation to our enemies to attack us.
As many of you will already know, this is precisely why the president has now taken such a firm stance against Europe and NATO. He believes -- and rightly so -- that the United States has been getting the raw end of the deal for far too long, while at the same time playing the role of babysitter for the European Union and NATO. Can you really blame him for adopting his current position?
You know, if you really stop to think about, it really does make a lot of sense if we consider what is going on in the world outside of politics. So what do I mean by this? Well, consider the following.
Let me start by asking you a simple question: What is a very common trend which we can see occurring throughout the world today? Quite simply, the big guys who have lots of money -- such as the conglomerates -- gobble up the little guys. For example, through a variety of tactics -- including financial incentives -- farming conglomerates swallow up small family farms and become even more powerful. Likewise, big banking institutions swallow up even smaller banks. Furthermore, large publishing houses swallow up smaller publishers. Huge news conglomerates swallow up smaller news stations. Large software companies constantly swallow up smaller software companies. HMOs gobble up smaller local hospitals. Large telecommunications companies swallow up the smaller ISPs.
And on and on this very same devouring process continues in every facet of life. While we as Bible-believing Christians may not like it and don't agree with it, nevertheless, it is the way of this present world where greed, money, profit and the lust for power are the only things that rule. As we all know, we simply live in a dog-eat-dog world. The end result is that most of the power ends up being concentrated in the hands of a very few. Of course, this is very dangerous, but honestly speaking, there is not really much that you and I can do about it. After all, most of us are the peons at the bottom of the barrel who are barely scraping by. However, we manage by God's Grace.
This veracious devouring process being as widespread as it obviously is, why should it really surprise us that this very same process occurs within the world of politics and global governance as well? The fact of the matter is that hegemony and empire-building is really nothing new. It has been around for literally thousands of years. Concentrating power in the hands of a few -- or even in the hands of one individual -- has in fact really been the norm. So looking at the issue from this perspective, it is possible that my theory regarding the United States, Russia and China may have more merit than what I at first realized.
So for those of my readers who have made it this far in this article, those are my crazy thoughts: a multipolar world or trilateral world divided into three primary sections, ruled by China, Russia and the United States. A world living under global peace, as long as each of the three emperors or kings stays in his own playground. "You stay out of my backyard, and I will also stay out of yours. Mutual respect." So what do YOU think? Is this possibly our future, or do you think that I am just plain crazy for even daring to suggest such a scenario? For those of you who may disagree with my rather outrageous idea, and who may want to come after me, please note that I have three vicious Doberman Pincer guard dogs. Just joking. They are actually German Shepherds. [smirk].
With these thoughts, I will bring this article to a close. It is my hope that you've found it informative and enlightening, and I pray that it has been a blessing in your life as well. If you have an account with Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr or with any other social network, I would really appreciate if you'd take the time to click or tap on the corresponding link that is found on this page. Thanks so much, and may God bless you abundantly!
For additional information and further study, you may want to refer to the list of reading resources below which were either mentioned in this article, or which contain topics which are related to this article. All of these articles are likewise located on the Bill's Bible Basics web server. To read these articles, simply click or tap on any link you see below.
2024 US Presidential Election: Into the Darkness
America vs. Iran: "This Was an Act of War"
America, Trump, MAGA and Peace, Safety and Prosperity
America: Land of the Free . . . and Hypocrisy!
Communism: Is the Dead Beast Really Dead?
Communism: The Raging Bear Out of Control!
Don't Ever Underestimate Our Spiritual Enemy
Donald Trump, Gaza, and the Tyre Prophecy
False Accusation: Trump is a Warmonger!
Gaza Strip Horrors and the Trump Plan
If You Poke a Bear Long Enough
Is Elon Musk the Antichrist?
It Is Time to Wake Up!
Obama, McCain and the Bush Legacy
President Trump and the Cashless Society
President Trump and the Golden Age
Saddam Hussein's Execution and the Euro-Dollar War
Science and Technology: The Forbidden Knowledge?
The Public School System and School Prayer
To Vote, or Not to Vote
What is Wrong with Modern America?
Who is the Real Terrorist?
Click or Tap Icons to Share! Thank you!
BBB Tools And Services
Please avail yourself of other areas of the Bill's Bible Basics website. There are many treasures for you to discover.